02.01.08
Posted in Articles, Depopulation Problem, Pro-life Issues, Contraception, Marriage Promotion at 8:02 pm by admin
I have total disrespect for the opinion of Bishop Oscar Cruz regarding his opinion that minimum marriage age must be increased from 18 to 24 years old.
Hey. If the Church cannot educate its members about marriage and sexuality, upping the marriage age to ridiculous ages will not save marriage. Why stop at 24? Why not 30? How about 35? Geeezzzz….
Bishop Cruz is shooting from the hip, or he is blinded or coerced by the Population controllers who would like nothing more than raise the marrying age.
News for you Bishop Oscar Cruz: 18 to 24 is the PRIME reproductive years of human beings. No man made laws will change that. 18-24 is nature’s laws.
What you should do: Pre-teens must be educated and convinced that they aspire for marriage, family and baby making beginning age 18. The well taught men and women are ready for marriage by age 18. The infantile culture of never maturing urbanites must not condemn the rest of the Filipino people with their marriage failures.
You want a better model? I say the muslims have a better model. They can get married at younger ages and achieve more success.
I’ve mentioned long before that my children will opt out of this rotten man corrupted culture of marriage failures. Upping the marriage age to 24 just proves my point that the mis-education of the Population controllers has infiltrated members of the Catholic Church.
The original universal intent of marriage is for the survival of the civilization, the proliferation of people, to enhance the reproduction of people.
Since 18 - 24 is the prime reproductive ages of people, and this is fixed by NATURE, you can’t change that, no preacher can change that. But you can WORK WITH NATURE. You can go along with NATURE and see that the reproductive activities of people ages 18-24 are put to good use… for actual reproduction… REAL SEX. Not fake contraceptive sex. Not “true love waits” aka “suppress sexual activity until the ages where you are no longer interested in sex.”
The result of a BAN ON MARRIAGE in the 18-24 age range is a more MARKED increase in “SINFUL” / non-marriage sex - leading to EVEN LESS CHILDREN, EVEN LESS FAMILY FORMATION, EVEN MORE CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE.
This 24 year old minimum marrying age idea belongs in the trash can.
See the news report from http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/man/2008/01/25/news/bishop.backs.revision.of.law.on.marriage.html
Friday, January 25, 2008
Bishop backs revision of law on marriage
A SENIOR official of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) is pushing to amend the law on the minimum legal age for marriage from 18 to 24.
During a dialogue last Wednesday with members of the House of Representatives and the Senate in Pasay City, former CBCP president and Lingayen Archbishop Oscar Cruz, head of the National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal, asked for the revision of the law on marriage.
Sun.Star Network Online’s coverage of the Sinulog 2008 Festival
Cruz said the present age requirement for marrying need to be refined, noting that an 18-year-old man and woman, are still incapable of living alone and has yet to establish his/her independence.
“They should be mentally and financially capable and prepared since marriage involves raising a family,” he said.
The bishop added that marriage is not like a girl and boy relationship, it involves many responsibilities that require physical, emotional and spiritual preparedness.
He said amending the marrying age requirement might be the solution to avert troubles in marriage.
However, Cruz said they are against divorce, since it is against the rulings of the church.
On the other hand, Senate President Manuel “Manny” Villar Jr. and House Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr., the discussion’s heads of the panel of legislators, said they will study Cruz’s recommendation. (FP/Sunnex)
Permalink
09.07.07
Posted in Articles, Pro-life Issues, Contraception at 11:46 am by admin
How would you feel if your own mother says you were an accident? That your mother had just given birth to your older brother a short 2 months ago; then your mother and father just felt horny one day and in the heat of their moment their spermicide failed them so here you are!
How would you feel if your own mother says you were an accident? That your mother was hospitalized for typhoid fever; then your mother and father just felt horny after leaving the hospital and because of your mother’s previous illness they lost count and their NFP failed them so here you are!
Oh how unwanted. Why your other siblings were so desired when they were intentionally made. But you…. you were just an accident. A slip up. In that moment of lust. Your parents just wanted to have a good time but their contraceptives failed them so your mom got pregnant with you. Life sucks.
And in return when mom and dad grow old you’d hurry up and turn them over to the nearest old folks home you can dump them in. Bet you if they called for help and even if you could help them you wouldn’t, even if their lives depended on it, you’d let them die and go to hell for all you care. Tit for tat.
The hate can consume you and your body will not be conducive for life. And you wonder why you’ve never been blessed with a child of your own. The end of this family branch.
Contraception. It all comes back at you.
Permalink
07.29.07
Posted in Articles, Pro-life Issues, Paternity DNA Tests at 10:01 am by admin
We were having breakfast this morning and my son wanted butter for his corn. Well I told him that the corn does not need any butter. So on and so forth.
My sister in law, the still single sister in law, to make a long story short says “Children are individuals, they are not extensions of you.”
I cleverly responded, “My children are individuals and they are extensions of me and my wife.”
Now that is parental authority affirming itself. That is at the heart of a true family system. It is not about legal definitions, family is about blood. I love my children because they are extensions of me and their mothers. By this point of view, I love all my children no matter what. I love my parents and grandparents no matter what. My children are extensions of myself, as I am an extension of my parents’ lives.
I’ve gotten to become the family healer and in the world of health, healing, this is absolutely true. The analysis of a persons’ conditions is not complete without studying the health conditions of his parents and grandparents. That is just the way things are.
Now the individualist mindset may choose to embrace his individualistic superstition all he wants, but that is them, not me, not my children. To each his own.
My children are extensions of myself and my wife’s lives. Why? Because I’m the father and I say so.
Permalink
04.13.07
Posted in Articles, Pro-life Issues at 11:12 am by goodsamaritan
I’ve always pointed to this hypocrisy in catholic schools being anti-life when it comes to pregnant students. Good thing there’s my good pal Nicolo Bernardo who writes for the UST Varsitarian. An eloquent article that should sway UST policy.
Battle of the ‘bulge’
by Nicolo Bernardo
STUDENT-discipline officers, for many years now, have been refusing admission to unmarried pregnant students, saying they might scandalize and influence others. Another supposed “reason,” according to sources, is that these expectant mothers should rather devote their time and health on their pregnancy.
Monkey see, monkey do? A student would hardly be “influenced” to go heavy with child just because she has a classmate with a bulging belly. It is one thing to frown on premarital sex, and it’s another to banish those who, due to passion, immaturity, or circumstances, fail the chastity ideal and are now with child. The failure of a teen mother could well be the failure of a school to educate her on sex in loco parentis, and so it is a school’s duty not to wash its hands off.
In these days of Church advocacy against abortion, the more the University should admit unmarried pregnant students. This would be a statement that a woman in her untimely pregnancy should stand for life despite her “mistake,” and that the school and the Church are willing to reach out even as the parents or the partner may be unwilling to support the pregnancy.
The “rest cure,” reportedly being advised by the disciplinarians, is incredulous. Academic requirements are mental and are not physically jolting. No credible physician would tell a woman to absolve herself from study or work just because of pregnancy. On the contrary, they are being advised to stay active and to exercise, so contractions during delivery can be easy. The traditional primadonna motherhood makes fat mothers, not healthy babies.
Ultimately, the “unwritten policy” is sexist. Since only women get pregnant, discriminating unmarried pregnant students is discriminating against women, while unmarried men who impregnate women go scot-free. The policy is neither preventive of premarital sex. In fact, sexually active students can just hook into contraception and abortion to prevent pregnancy.
Let’s face it. Teen pregnancies are up and it would not help keeping all pregnant students away from school. This only makes their pregnancy all the more “unwanted.” Ask your nearest college guidance counselor. You will be shocked to hear how frequent they have to entertain cases of students contemplating abortion for fear of academic sanctions. If we were to dismiss into oblivion pregnant teens to prevent “scandal,” then we would be like the hypocritical fundamentalists who stone unmarried pregnant women “to teach others a lesson.”
Top Catholic and secular universities like Harvard, Berkeley, Stanford, Georgetown, Marquette, Loyola-Baltimore, and Notre Dame universities, instead of kicking out unmarried pregnant students, even provide them multiple services: from health care, to counseling, to campus ministry, to deans’ support. The result? The Guttmacher Institute reports that abortions among college-based women declined by 30 per cent in the US, a decade after this move in Catholic universities started in 1994. (Abortion was legalized in America after the Roe vs. Wade case, partly when “Roe’s” lawyer argued that an unmarried pregnant woman cannot complete her education.)
Pregnancy is supposed to be good news. It can be distressing until we work for a way for every child to be welcome. If rules can’t be bent for the unwed expectant mother, then do so for the child’s sake. One does not protect the pregnant woman by joining the shame campaign. Depriving her of Catholic education and formation will only spell more trouble.
Let us just think what Jesus would probably do in this case. He welcomed the “sinful” Mary Magdalene, even took her into his circle of friends, to teach and educate her. He did not kick her out of his school of life, neither did he refuse his other fallen disciples. In fact, Jesus came precisely for these people.
What Christian mandate then does any administrator have to refuse educating the pregnant “sinfuls” in this Pontifical and Catholic University? What affair has anyone to pressure a girl to marry, not really for love, but for the “shame” of her out-of-wedlock pregnancy? Rather, UST should go this far—extending pregnant student services, and be liberal about being charitable.
Permalink
02.28.07
Posted in Articles, Pro-life Issues, Contraception at 9:29 am by goodsamaritan
I was in a meeting yesterday and the prolifers were discussing about a certain talk show host asking what prolifers have done for the woman who has 15 babies. It was more of a taunting question “blaming” prolifers for not conforming with the contraceptive hordes.
I told the prolifers that you should have sent me over there and had a word with this Howie Severino host.
I would have first, congratulated the woman and her husband! Outstanding mother, a great service to her family, to her children, her children will be great assets to the community and may their bloodlines live on.
Next, I would ask who and where to contact this woman. She must have absolutely have HEALTHY genes and a healthy diet. I must know her secrets, her values. At the same time I’d like to see how her children are growing up. Maybe she has some daughters that are compatible with my sons and we could combine forces and have a happy pronatal family!
I would have told Howie Severino about my great grandmother and great grandfather who had 17 children. I got pictures. My grandmother is evidence, and I’m one of the descendants.
Ah 15 children. What a dream. I’m still sexually active and with some health still left in me, who knows?
And what are the anti-life forces doing about all those barren people with ZERO babies? Ha ha ha, they are reveling in their “accomplishment”. Population control they say. Good thing I made www.fertilityhelp.net to hopefully undo their damage.
Permalink
01.13.07
Posted in Pro-life Issues at 5:24 pm by goodsamaritan
I visited the Pro-Life Philippines office this afternoon and a lone councilor was was there. My innocent question was: “What are the most common counselling queries lately?” Answer: “As usual, female 20-25 years old is pregnant and suddenly abandoned by her boyfriend.”
My follow up question was: “Is the problem because they are financially incapable?”
Answer: “No, they are usually middle class, the women usually come from the provinces, they come to Manila to find work, they become pregnant, and are ashamed / at a loss as to what to say to their provincial families once they come back home. That their in-eutero child has no father…”
So it is more of a shame thing. Fear of societal non-acceptance of a child with an absent father.
But my interest is, why do these certain boyfriends abandon their impregnated girlfriends?
My analysis and main culprit is: The boyfriend-girlfriend relationship is an ambiguously defined agreement between a male and a female which can mean anything which may include NOTHING.
There is the usual accusation that the man only wanted sexual pleasure. Then there is the fact that there are men who want no involvement in the raising of children. Then there is the fact that there are men who are not fond of children. Then there are men who have no money for this new endeavor.
Ah, lack of money. An urban innovation where the cost of child raising is astronomical. Today’s money system is skewed, many people lack money. Of course the money system is ridiculous! This present money system cannot even support the basic human instinct of reproduction. And the greedy money masters / oligarchs / global bankers even have the gall to blame natural human reproduction as the cause of their own poverty!
Money is supposed to serve the people, not enslave them. A better money system must be constructed.
Permalink
11.21.06
Posted in Pro-life Issues at 10:25 pm by goodsamaritan
Oh yeah yeah yeah!
Time to celebrate!
Congratulations to the Nicaraguans!
WELCOME BACK TO THE CIVILIZED WORLD!
Nicaragua bans all abortion
November 19, 2006 12:00am
Article from: Sunday Herald Sun
NICARAGUAN President Enrique Bolanos has signed a Bill banning abortion in all cases despite opposition from doctors, women’s rights groups and diplomats.
Presidential spokesman Lindolfo Mojarretz told Associated Press that Bolanos signed the Bill on Friday and that it will become law when it appears in the official register.
Previously, Nicaragua allowed abortions if three doctors certified that the woman’s health was at risk. The law signed yesterday eliminated that century-old exception.
The six-year prison term for carrying out illegal abortions remains unchanged under the new law. There had been doubt about whether Bolanos would sign the law because he had sought stiffer sentences of up to 30 years for women who had abortions and for those who aided them.
Chile and El Salvador have similarly strict abortion laws.
Most countries in Catholic Latin America permit the procedure if the woman’s life is in danger, but ban it in cases resulting from rape or incest.
Cuba permits abortions within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and Colombia recently authorised them in the case of a severely malformed fetus, if rape or incest were involved, or if the woman’s life was in danger.
Nicaragua’s National Assembly passed the Bill on October 26 despite a letter from European Union diplomats and UN representatives asking them to wait until after the November 5 presidential election.
Nicaragua’s medical association also asked for a delay, saying the issue had become politicised.
President-elect Daniel Ortega, who once favoured abortion rights, changed his stance and supported the law after strongly embracing Roman Catholicism and winning over voters in a country with a conservative religious tradition. - AP
Permalink
11.20.06
Posted in Pro-life Issues at 10:05 am by goodsamaritan
This deserves a reprint. The original article came from HLI. - Thanks Dr. MAP.
Monday, Oct. 30, 06 1:30 PM EST
CONTACT: Jason Jones, 540-622-5289 Email: jjones@hli.org »
Human Life International Praises Nicaragua’s Unanimous Vote to Ban All Abortions; Denounces Internationalist Attempt to Coerce Vote
Catholic leader states: “This vote…has sent a clear message…that thinly veiled United Nations-instigated extortion [attempts] will not work.”
FRONT ROYAL, Va., Human Life International (HLI)—the world’s largest pro-life, pro-family human rights organization, with over 90 affiliates in 75 countries around the world—applauds yesterday’s unanimous vote by the Nicaraguan Congress to ban all types of abortion, without exception.
“I congratulate these lawmakers for the courage that they have displayed by voting to boldly and unequivocally stand for the protection of the innocent unborn, despite overwhelming international pressure to vote in favor of the status quo,” said the Rev. Thomas J. Euteneuer, STL, president of HLI. Fr. Euteneuer is referring to an official letter sent to Eduardo Gomez, president of the Nicaraguan National Assembly, prior to the vote by representatives from donor countries encouraging him to defeat the proposed ban. Signatories of the letter included Alfredo Missair, representative of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP); Eva Zetterberg, Swedish ambassador; Kerry Max, development counselor from Canada; Inger Hirvela Lopez, ambassador of Finland; and Francesca Mosca, ambassador of the European Union, “This vote is not only an unparalleled victory for the sanctity and dignity of all human life, but has sent a clear message to the international community that thinly veiled United Nations-instigated extortion letters will not work.
“While this victory is unquestionably an answer to the sincere prayers of millions of Nicaraguans, it is also important to note that it is also largely due to the unwavering hard work and dedication of Dr. Rafael Cabrera, leader of our HLI affiliate, ANPROVIDA, and I thank him for that,” stated Euteneuer. A dramatic prelude to the vote took place earlier this month with a historic march in which several hundred thousand Nicaraguans marched to the steps of the National Assembly with a pro-life petition signed by 300,000 citizens.
Now, the bill must be signed into law by Nicaraguan President Enrique Bolanos. Radical pro-abortion groups have threatened to do everything possible to prevent this from happening, but Fr. Euteneuer remains hopeful: “This is not a genie that can be easily forced back into its bottle. Nicaraguans have made clear that they are proudly pro-life and it is my sincere prayer that this support will embolden President Bolanos to sign this bill into law.”
Founded in 1981, Human Life International is the world’s largest pro-life, pro-family organization that is dedicated to defending life, faith and the family, with branches and affiliates around the world.
Permalink
08.15.06
Posted in Articles, Pro-life Issues at 10:05 pm by goodsamaritan
LewRockwell.com featured Butler Shaffer’s opinion on how to end all wars. Of course I think it is a good idea. I for one will never send my children to war to die as cannon fodder. They will stay at home with their families and help defend our own tribe.
To end all wars, we must learn to love our children and grandchildren more than we do the state. This is why the secular nation states do not promote close family ties; it is against the interest of the state.
Shaffer’s article is a good read especially for the warmongers.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer142.html
Permalink
07.19.06
Posted in Articles, Depopulation Problem, Pro-life Issues, Contraception, Marriage Promotion at 5:27 am by goodsamaritan
A few paragraphs from the booklet “Sexuality & TV: Enlightening the Practitioner and the Viewer” by Probe Production and the Ford Foundation (2004) shows some really dumb contradictions in the backward progress of human life imposed by the perception of a global economy or global media culture.
On page 4:
“In small, relatively isolated societies - and there are almost none of them left - life’s passages are uncomplicated. Parenting starts early and families survive off the land, with the help of an extended kinship system. Remember that until 1988, our laws actually allowed girls to marry at age 14 and the boys at 16.
Today, life is very different. We are all part of a global cash economy and raising a family involves many more responsibilities, making early pregnancies and early marriages unacceptable. Both males and females are postponing marriage so they can build their careers before starting a family.
Advances in the medical sciences have also made us more conscious of the risks involved with teenage pregnancies and parenting - young girls literally have one foot in the grave then they become pregnant. If the mother and child survive the difficult child-bearing, there are many other obstacles to overcome. Children of very young parents face many more risks for health problems, and even early death.”
These are the basic assumptions, the founding theories of this book and what the imperialists have brainwashed the people with. What a load of crap. I will explain.
The book highlights that in the Philippines in 2004, television is the #1 educator and deemed most credible form of media at almost 70% with a penetration rate of almost 100%. No wonder people have gotten dumb and dumber.
The first paragraph above says that life was much simpler… and easier… before imperialist times. Women were permitted to marry by law beginning age 14 (until 1988). Not so ancient people correctly married, had sex, became pregnant, became parents in the teenage years. Those who today are shocked at such statements of fact are truly uneducated, ignorant and intolerant.
The global CREDIT economy has made life more difficult for people who are brainwashed. They see marriage and starting a family as a bothersome obstacle in their success in life and set marriage as a very low priority. Reproduction is sacrificed via the use of all forms of contraception including abortion disguised in the book as the doublespeak term “reproductive health”.
The so called advances in medical sciences… western pharmaceutical medicine… do their scaremongering technique by convincing women that getting pregnant is a GRAVE DISEASE… the term they use is “having one foot in the grave” (while one is pregnant). More loads of brainwashing bullsh*t.
It is clear that today’s people are a sexually repressed people. The true, non-political, biological calling is to begin sex at 14 for girls and 16 for boys. Through the machinations, branding, and miseducation tools of the imperialists, true sexuality is suppressed and sabotaged under the international euphemism of “reproductive health”. Thus 14, 15, 16, 17 years of age are now legally misclassified as minors and all forms of sex with people of this age is illegal. These ages are today prohibited from marriage. But the hypersexualized media bombards these age groups with sexual images. The perverse solution of the imperialists is to impose contraception on our people to suppress our true reproductive calling.
The book talks about the imperialist concept of “reproductive rights” but all that is a coverup for contraceptive promotion. The imperialists have lobbied congress to make it illegal / denied the reproductive rights, for then legal ages of 14-17 to have sex or get married. Reproductive rights advocates promote contraception and at the same time condemns those who choose not to use contraception as being “denied reproductive rights” or closed minded. More doublespeak.
So far the imperialist depopulation lobby has succeeded. Marrying ages have been raised. Marriage is now passe. Fertility rates have come crashing down to negative levels. Contraception has made this happen. Less Filipino children are born.
The imperialists see Filipinos as cockroaches to be exterminated. Plain and simple pest control techniques are implemented.
Permalink
« Previous entries ·
