07.01.06
Posted in Marriage Promotion, Polygamy at 10:23 am by goodsamaritan
Q: If a wife refuses to have sexual relations with her husband, is she being unfaithful to the marriage contract? Although I have no intention of divorcing my wife, I believe that her unwillingness to honor the marriage contract is the same as breaking the marriage contract, thus grounds for divorce.
She has no physical reason for denying the conjugal relationship. The present reason is that there are too many other things which need to be done. Over the years it has ranged from mood complaints to protesting that it wasn’t the right of the husband to demand or expect anything. She has stated that it isn’t fair to expect such things if she doesn’t feel like it.
I have tried everything. She won’t agree to counseling of any kind and any books or tapes I suggest are viewed as being pushy on my part.
Now she has discovered that her husband is battling sexual temptations and is coming down hard on him for not being mentally faithful. She exhibits a great deal of self-righteous contempt and offers up how bitter she is that he has such temptations.
Should I again state for the 1,000th time that I feel neglected, abused, trapped and bitter?
I love her and I won’t leave her. But this is not my fault. She is, in fact, responsible for my unreasonable temptations. I have two children and am a minister with a church and a wife who doesn’t see any obligations. What should I do?
I’m bitter. I’m trapped. I guess this is just my cross to bear.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
06.13.06
Posted in Contraception, Depopulation Problem, Marriage Promotion, Polygamy, Pro-life Issues at 10:59 pm by goodsamaritan
An often defense of my mother in law regarding the legality of polygamy in the bible’s old testament books is that there were a lot less people during that time.
I say there was indeed a rapid increase in the number of people in the past 200 years. But the imposition of monogamy for all lead to contraception and now a spiralling population decline, abortion, promiscuity, wholesale family destruction, homosexuality… a 21st century de facto Soddom and Gommorha.
It is time to bring back polygamy in vogue. Let the true family men and family women meet up and foster a renewed interest in authentic marriage and solid families.
I dare say the oppositors of polygamy are either selfish, ignorant, or sexual perverts thinking polygamy is merely a reflection of their own sexual perversions.
It is time to call in the heavy artillery, it is time to bring in the cavalry. Desperate times call for desperate measures. It is allowing polygamy… authentic marriage promotion, which will bring peace, order, and children to lands taken over by fornication and contraception.
I dare say to all of you calling yourself Pro-lifers. Think. Ask. Research. Throw away your dogma. Post your comments and start a discussion. Stop scratching your heads. Stop being stumped. Stop losing the pro-life fight to the anti-life. I’d like pro-lifers to make great leaps in marriage promotion, family promotion, children promotion. This is it folks.
The core problem is the forced monogamy system for all, except Islam.
Philippine Islam, while allowing polygamy side by side with monogamy, disallowing boyfriend girlfriend relationships, and promoting marriage for all; is far and away superior in marriage formation, family stability.
Permalink
06.11.06
Posted in Depopulation Problem, Polygamy at 10:00 am by goodsamaritan
PRI is hoping a reverse in the population decline is possible within the next decades. I do not think it will happen.
It is only natural though that the PRI writers are sympathetic to their own race and religion which is mostly white and Christian.
I do not see anything wrong with Islam, they are as human as everybody else. Maybe some of the muslims procreate more, but the population controllers have succeeded in brainwashing most muslims of contraception as well.
The hope I do see is if and when polygamy sees legality in the white and Christian world do I see any hope in saving their kind.
Why do I keep yammering about polygamy saving the world from population decline, contraception and liberal values? Because it is the truth.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
06.06.06
Posted in Contraception, Polygamy at 2:19 pm by admin
I’m sure some of you have experienced this with your lovely wives.
#1 Don’t believe it. Don’t take it seriously.
#2 Do not indulge on her unreasonableness by taking the contraceptive plunge.
#3 If she does take contraceptives behind your back, swear never to “do” her again.
Chin up, be the man! Remember, if she turns her back on womanhood, motherhood, her whole female sexuality, it is her loss, not yours. All the more reason to take in a new wife.
Polygamy is a way better option than the divorce culture.
Permalink
05.29.06
Posted in Marriage Promotion, Polygamy at 9:15 am by admin
I’ve always wanted something like this for my descendants…
http://www.jamaat.org/islam/WomanSociety.html
We have discussed a Muslim woman’s status with regard to her husband and the children. What then of her relations with men other than her husband and her close relatives? This is where a considerable difference is found between Islamic practice and the customs now prevalent in the Western world. In the West, sexual relations outside marriage are still in theory generally considered a sin or at least vaguely undesirable, but in practice no steps whatsoever are taken to reduce the very high incidence of pre-marital and extra-marital sexual relations in spite of the soaring rates of illegitimacy and venereal disease. On the contrary, in films, television and certain sections of the press there is every encouragement to consider pre-marital experience desirable and extra-marital affairs quite normal. Contraception or abortion is expected to conveniently get rid of any undesirable side-affects of this way of life.
In contrast with this uncontrolled situation, Islam advocates a number of specific measures to reduce the temptations towards sex outside marriage.
To begin with, the Prophet advised all people to get married if they could, so that their natural desires should have a legitimate and legal fulfilment.
Secondly, due to the permission for limited polygamy there is no necessity for there to be a surplus of unattached women is the society.
Thirdly women are directed in the Qur’an when they appear in public to cover themselves in a modest type of dress so as not to attract men.
Fourthly the Muslim way of life excludes the boy-friend/Girl-friend system, mixed parties, dancing between men and women, taking alcohol or drugs, and other facets of the Western way of life which are well known to provide the situation from which pre-marital and extra-marital sexual relations develop. Social entertainments in Islam are generally either within the family and close friends of the family, or among men and women in separate groups.
Fifthly sex outside marriage is considered in Islam law not only as a sin but as a crime which is punished under the law in the same way as theft or murder. The punishment for it applies equally to the man and woman and is severe and deterrent in its effect.
Let me now look back at some of these points in more detail since they are very relevant to the life style of a Muslim woman.
Permalink
05.28.06
Posted in Polygamy at 7:37 am by admin
Most Secular / Christian women today do not follow traditional wedding vows of Zero Contraception or having as many children as God gives. In fact, today’s common woman says she wants to stop at 2. By the time my sons grow up, their women will want to stop at 1 or none. Then there is the epidemic of infertility and late marriages that they have to deal with.
To protect my sons and my family’s bloodline, we must be open to the option of polygamy. And the legal way to do this in our area is Islam. I’ve talked to a friend regarding sponsorship. We will see.
Permalink
05.23.06
Posted in Marriage Promotion, Polygamy at 9:38 am by admin
In the 11th episode of Big Love, we are treated to a front row seat of the 3 wives various backgrounds and belief systems. Especially the contrast between Barb’s LDS and Nicki’s “The Principle” / Polygamy / FLDS.
Although the city suburb where the Henrickson’s live is dominated by LDS, Nicki points out loose morals abound.
This is exemplified with Nicki and Margene honking the car horn to disrupt a torrid french kissing scene between Ben and his girlfriend Brynn.”This is why mothers shouldn’t work!” Nicki exclaims.
Margene and the whole family is all smiles and happy to find out she is pregnant with her 3rd child.
This brings me to the difference between Polygamous and Monogamous marriage systems:
Allowing polygamy (not requiring) can and does enforce conservative values because it fulfills the natural sexuality of people. Mothers present at home allows easier and more successful raising of more children. Conservative sexuality channeled for reproduction leads to more children and a growing population.
Forcing Monogamy for all (as the only form of marriage) enforces an unnatural bind on the sexuality of people, thus they are destined to become liberals. Liberal sexuality is 90% contraceptive… for the purpose of pleasure. Children are more often raised not by their own biological mothers, but in schools and day care. Liberal birth rates are markedly very low. Liberal values lead to a declining population.
Permalink
05.05.06
Posted in Polygamy at 6:56 am by admin
In the Non-Islamic cultures of the Philippines, government laws state that we fall under their forced monogamous system.
I know of many Filipino family who through several generations have shown that 100% of all its male members have either extra wives with children, mistresses with children, have extra children with other women. This means grandfathers, fathers and sons… none can comply with the demands of forced monogamy. Maybe it is because they are smart, handsome, and desireable women from all around demand their sperm donations, they are the ones pursued by women. These women cared not, nor respected forced monogamy laws. These are the family’s grandmothers, mothers, and daughters. They saw the sperm donor they wanted and got their genetic material by hook or by crook.
As you can see, the myopic stereotype that polygamy tendencies are a male-only fantasy is FALSE. It takes both MEN and many more WOMEN women as shown in the example family above. If the laws of the land allowed polygamy, this would have served these families better.
Permalink
04.24.06
Posted in Marriage Promotion, Polygamy at 11:59 pm by admin
Absolutely wonderful piece this Jamaican writer Tony Robinson has written. He opens up with:
“So now you’re going to deem me immoral, amoral and chauvinistic. Imagine, promoting the idea of men having more than one wife, when in fact they often complain how one wife gives so much trouble. Well, happily I can say that the idea is certainly not mine, as polygamy, or the acquisition of multiple wives, is as old as time itself.”
Funny, true and honest work. Contratulations on the ending paragraph,
“Still, I say, hail polygamy, and even though many of you ladies may be fuming as you disagree with me, almost every man I know would vote for it. Plus if you really gave it serious thought, you may even agree for the above reasons, no lying, no deception, no suspicion, and you would always know where he is.”
See the whole article in the Jamaica Observer.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
04.15.06
Posted in Marriage Promotion, Polygamy at 1:44 pm by admin
The polygamy rights movement has a chance to save marriage and families. As I have always advocated, government must be taken out of the business of marriage. It is government marriage laws that contributes to the spiralling decline of family viability.
So actually, “polygamy rights is the next civil rights battle” because it actually provides the true conservative, yet win-win, solution to finally ending the legalized “government marriage” debate once and for all. By removing big government from unconstitutionally defining marriage in any form (after all, no one in the Bible was ever married “by government”), the true conservative position of limited government frees and resolves both sides of the debate. The biological impossibility of “same sex marriage” can neither be used to re-define marriage nor be used to empower government to tyrannically force churches to perform homosexual “weddings.” Likewise, without anyone’s marriage (real or imagined) being defined by government, then if homosexuals subsequently want to imagine that they are somehow “married,” they are free to have their imaginations. And, those who choose homosexual behavior can also realize their claimed intent of so-called legal “equality” with those who choose “one man, one woman” and with any anyone else who does not accept such imaginings of supposed “same sex marriage.” Everyone becomes truly free and no one is forced to accept anyone else’s big government agendas or re-definitions. And true conservatives can rejoice in limited government principles finally prevailing - and ending the frankenstein-monster of big “government marriage” altogether.
See the full article here.
Truthfully, not one person in the Bible was ever married “by” any government.
Permalink
« Previous entries · Next entries »
