Come on, you married THE CHAMP. Spreading seeds is what champions do! There is the reproductive rush in winning competitions and all that money. Champs bedding lots of women is expected, it is the norm. Welcome to human life 101.

Divorce settlement for Elin? Not bad, hundreds of millions of dollars. That’s great. But wouldn’t it have been better if you and Tiger knew this tiny bit of information about human nature earlier? Did you know you could have still lived a happy life with Tiger even if he had playthings? You could have been the woman he truly loved, the woman to come home to, even if he spreads his seeds every now and then. This is what champs do!

What is unacceptable is this much media outcry to castrate a champ like Tiger Woods. In-human. Life doesn’t work that way. Monogamous marriage in the USA will come tumbling down with easy divorce clauses such as these. It is idiotic. Let the human race sort itself out to something more lasting and more solid.

In my country, moneyed men will play but have a budget for it. It is poor form for them to leave their wives. Some have multiple wives, an instituted polygamy whether formal or informal, but that is how things work. And it has worked for several hundred years. Polygamy is outright legal and instituted for Muslims. While there is no law against having multiple unmarried girl friends with many children each.

The Elen Nordegren – Tiger Woods divorce just highlights the USA wrong system of easy divorce and serial marriages. Plain idiocy. No one should bother getting married in the USA, it’s just a piece of paper enslaving men for unreasonable demands they get absolutely no benefit from.

Keep your american junk system out of the Philippnes. Gabriela anti-women / anti-family group stay out of the Philippines, go and migrate to the USA and be miserable like Elen Nordegren – miserable with so much money.

What is peculiar with people is sometimes females who want champion sperm are even paid by the champion himself. Gossipers are saying Krista bagged a large sum of money. But hey, maybe the champ wants his baby to grow up in style as well. It takes quite a lot of money to raise kids these days.

Then there are those people who give unsolicited advice to the legal wife. I personally do not like subtraction. Addition? Polygamy, that is fine. Manny should be a man and do his addition.  Keep them all, grow them all, happy.  He has enough resources to do so.

Narrow minded people should let the champ be the champ.  Champs need to breed.  I would even think Mommy Dionisia (Manny’s mom) is excited to have grandchildren as beautiful as Krista Ranillo.

If I know Krista Ranillo’s lineage, she should be pro-life, she should know when it is the most opportune time to make her kids. If she needs more impregnation tips, she can just click on over to www.fertilityhelp.net to help her make her little champions.

I wish Krista and Manny all the best in their baby project. May you show those wicked tongued showbiz paparazzi that baby making is serious business. Hope the baby looks like you Krista!

See a video of Krista Ranillo at MSClavel.com

Youtube video description: Christian polygamy works. Two wives, plural marriage, or polygamy, is not abuse or manipulation of women, but is a perfectly normal AND happy way of life for many people in today’s society. CHRISTIAN POLYGAMY PAMPHLET: http://www.box.net/shared/eq5qjxm12n

It is odd why at many times children may be so ungrateful and unappreciative of just of important and just how blessed we all are because these two elderly people decided that a lifetime marriage is absolutely necessary and one of the best forms of organizations out there.

I was looking around this evening and appreciated a very beautiful extended family gathering. Beautiful children, beautiful grandchildren. Ah yes, there is a bright reproductive future for all. The clan will live on, the descendants will live on and reproduce.

I sincerely hope to make a celebration of sorts when the time comes. It comes sooner than you think. Already I was making fun of my sister in law all panicky with kids soon to be teenagers. Funny because we are not that old to have forgotten about raging hormones at that age. Life is exciting. Keep smiling.

Now that we have discovered a lot of health truths, and we had a mostly healthy dinner celebration, growing old like my in-laws is a good blast. They are robustly healthy compared to their diseased and dead peers.

When selecting a woman for a mate, companion, wife, it is very important to not lose track of our primary objective in life, which is to make more life. Sure a woman of your liking may seem very pretty, but beauty is useless and pointless if she is unwilling to bear your children.

The problem is males still run on pure instinct. Young males look for the prettiest thing. In the old days, the prettiest thing also engaged in reproductive sex which led to children and the raising of children. Nowadays many women are taught to engage in contraceptive sex with abortion as a backup. Women are taught that raising one’s own children is pathetic so they strive to work at anything other than raising their own children. Leave children to be raised by professional strangers paid to raise children.

Then there is the problem of rampant un-health. As people have degenerated through the generations due to bad habits, bad food, knowing all the bad health practices as dictated by commercial television, radio and magazines. Their capabilities to bear children are extremely diminished. Many are infertile, many cannot bring a pregnancy to term.

Choosing a woman these days is a very delicate thing. You must make clear your objectives. You have the health, the wealth and the will to make children and your choice of women must meet your wishes. Birds of the same feather flock together. Seek the right woman and you will find her.

Witness today’s end result of the depopulation agenda. Women will have 2, 1 or none. It is pretty obvious that many men will not be satisfied with merely reproducing 2, 1 or none with a wife. In fact it makes no sense to pledge allegiance to merely one woman if all she is able to give you is 1 child. This is genetic survival instincts at work. This is why divorces and no-marriages make better sense. Casual relations for the mere making of 1 child as used to be done by mistresses does not need marriage. A woman with 1 or 2 children is merely a mistress. So majority of 21st century women are merely mistresses.

Now with the advancement of DNA Paternity Tests to near ubiquity, who needs marriage? A man will simply make a couple of children with a number of ever willing women. If the child looks much like him, well and good, if not, a DNA test clears things up.

Today’s women who are independent and earn their own money say they do not need a man, except for sperm to make their baby. So all is well and good. Everyone is happy.

Now I do not know exactly the trajectory of childrens’ future. But if there is a monogamous material prospect spouse out there, it will make our lives simpler.

Ask yourself this question in the future your son brings home a girl and you have a chat. You ask the girl how many children she wants to have. She may most likely say 1 child, (2 if you are lucky), is she capable in health in the first place. One child? You expect my son to devote all his time, energy, resources on that woman for the prospect of 1 child? One measly grandchild from one of my sons? You girl, do not deserve monogamy, not from my son.

We want a girl who will give us a future. Just like my little girl. My little girl says she wants 10 babies. And she has zero vaccinations, zero drugs, eats a fully organic semi-raw meat diet. She is disease free and totally healthy. She may just be capable of giving 10 babies to a deserving man.

We want the same kind of girl for our sons. Otherwise, non-marriage and polygamy will be the future of my sons.

Hey, my natural calling to desire children was around 20 years old. I called for marriage by the time I was 25 but my then 22 year old wife to be was not “ready” at her age then. My sister got married at 23. My mother got married at 22. My grandmother got married at 19.

My friend’s mother got married at 14. It was legal during their time. And the family’s approved of it. A lot of visayans in the province of Samar have the tradition of marrying off their children at 14 and 15. Even today, in Islamic Philippine society, the minimum marrying age for islamic women is 16 years old.

I’m trying to tweak the minds of all you narrow minded nay sayers. Yes you, who would rather have teenagers exhaust their expected biological sexuality with unsatisfying condoms and poison birth control pills. Different strokes for different folks. DIVERSITY ROCKS…. not your uniformitarian COMMUNISM.

Do you call yourself a Christian? At what age did you think The Virgin Mary bore Jesus? She was 14 and to be married to Joseph. Oh, so now you call your Christian God a pedophile?

Raising the minimum marrying age in the Philippines from 14 to 18 was a BIG MISTAKE. It was pressure from the international community backed my hundreds of millions of dollars in depopulation funding by the imperialist governments. Now I hear the same funders and their idiot minions pushing to increase the minimum marrying age to 24. Tsk tsk tsk… People do not EVOLVE that fast.

This 15 year old has her reproductive instincts kicking in. But unfortunately for her, her communist society will not approve. This is why she resorts to going “wild.” She will do what she needs to do to produce her baby.

In more conservative, wiser times, the people understood that there are women at this age that come to heat. This is why they accommodated these people into the institution of marriage. It’s just their time. It was time for her to have her baby, so LET HER. Marry her off to a nice man who also believed in marriage and also believed in babies.

Maybe the virgin Mary would have turned into something like this “wild” teen if she wasn’t married off during HER TIME.

I would like to repeat again my call to all you narrow minded communists. Different strokes for different folks. Let us not oppress the people who’s reproductive calling comes at 14 or 15 years of age.

Welcome to the 21st century, the age of the “liberal”, doesn’t look happy to me. Looks like only misery, deceit, lies, rumors and woe upon children. The perfect depopulation scam executed.

But there is a glimmer of hope. DNA Paternity Tests to the rescue. Did you know that all the conservatism and the institution of marriage was based on ASSURED paternity? That the chasteness of a woman was to ASSURE paternity? That the assurance of paternity is the only thing that kept 2 families glued to jointly raise children?

Now look at these two young teenage people. Because in their society, in their time, marriage is not allowed for their age. Because in their time contraceptive sex is expected for their age. Even more horrifying, in their time abortion is offered as a “valid choice” by the devil they call the government. It’s a good thing they still had their respective parents.

Their conflict began when the teenage boy heard rumors of the teenage mothers’ infidelities. These are mere rumors, hearsay. Without a paternity test at birth, he could not be sure. Not even with the baby having the same curled ear.

If in their time they had DNA Paternity Testing at birth, none of this conflict will have arisen. A DNA Paternity test result could substitute for the marriage institution that is lost in the 21st century. In DNA tests we trust.

In the natural scheme of things, healthy men are sexually active when called upon for action. Women have a cycle where they are interested in sex when the time is “right”. That right time is when she is healthy and willing to bear children. A pregnant female is not interested in any more sex, nor should she be having sex, she is already pregnant. Do you understand?

Once a female has given birth, she needs to breast feed her little one for some 2 years and stick close to her baby. At this time there is no desire for children. And if there is no desire for children, no sex is desired.

Now the civilization and other means of organization have come up with marriage. A man for every child to ensure that children are better taken cared of. A man and his whole family plus the woman and her family is a pretty good idea. Since a woman may only be interested in sex every 2 to 3 years it makes no sense for a man to with hold his sexuality in those 2 to 3 years where a woman is not sexually available, nor should it make sense to rush a woman and have additional children when she is not healthy nor ready yet. So it was and still is natural for men to have multiple wives. Everyone was happy with this arrangement. The man’s family had more offspring through their men. And the women could pick the best men in their village to fertilize them. Polygamy was the norm and everyone was happy.

Then an imperialist civilization arose and through their primitive monetary system and contraceptive technology had the dumb idea to impose government business partnerships called marriage and made it exclusive and unnatural. They called this invention monogamy. An artificial construct founded on contraceptive herbs and technology. They made it law that men and women can marry only one at a time. If they wanted a new partner, they needed to divorce their old partner. In the old days, you just added a new wife and everyone was happy. Common divorces made people unhappy in the empire and eventually the concept of marriage became moot and no one wanted to have anything with that government partnership called marriage.

Fast forward 2000 years later today in my country. Monogamy is made possible through contraceptive technology. Women become sexual toys, sexual receptacles, available to give and receive sexual pleasure any time with minimum possibilities of pregnancy. In government marriage, men are given the unnatural burden to have sex with only one woman because with contraceptive technology, that woman, his wife can supposedly fill all his sexual entertainment wants.

But this is unnatural. Millions of years of evolution cannot be enforced by man made laws policing sexual behavior. What happens today is that contraceptive technology has debased sexuality into a religion of entertainment, of pleasure, instead of sex being a means for reproduction. This sexual repression has led to enormous industries serving the contraceptive side effects. Prostitution is the all encompassing side effect. Millions of women are now prostitutes for money, for food, for love, for free. Millions of men have been stunted of their maturities by submitting to contraceptive sex.

Millions of women feel they are goddesses, they control a man through his contraceptive penis. What a shame. What a low down shame people have gone today. Men submitting to women and thanking them for sex? Give me a break.
Top grade males are always in high demand. Top grade males do not submit to contraceptive slavery. A woman who partners with top grade males want their sperm, they demand it, top material to make their babies with.

And punishing males for their non-compliance to monogamy?  What an an unnatural man made abomination of laws we are  living in.  Most wives cannot keep their end of the bargain.  Most of them don’t enjoy being sexual receptacles and have sex during times they don’t want to.  Contraceptive technology is imperfect and unhealthy in the first place.  Those health conscious women will merely abstain from sex.  And where does that leave their husbands?  Back to nature.

The idea of a 2nd wife, 3rd wife, 4th wife doesn’t sound so bad after all now.  What woman wants to give birth year after year after year?

First wife is pregnant, sexual relations stop and continue only when her child is 2 to 4 years old.  A 2nd wife may be a good idea, and when that wife becomes pregnant, a 3rd wife may be a good idea, then a 4th wife, then it is back to wife number 1 then 2, then 3 then 4.  Everyone is happy.

All that is needed today is a change in the monetary system and everyone should be happy.  If each and every child came with a guaranteed living fund, people would choose the natural way.  I’m dreaming.  The international money masters, the bankers would never want this.  They want the money and the power all to themselves.

Government monogamous only marriage is just one of their tools to control a hapless citizenry.

Hey.  If the Church cannot educate its members about marriage and sexuality, upping the marriage age to ridiculous ages will not save marriage.  Why stop at 24?  Why not 30?  How about 35?  Geeezzzz….

Bishop Cruz is shooting from the hip, or he is blinded or coerced by the Population controllers who would like nothing more than raise the marrying age.

News for you Bishop Oscar Cruz:  18 to 24 is the PRIME reproductive years of human beings.  No man made laws will change that.  18-24 is nature’s laws.

What you should do:  Pre-teens must be educated and convinced that they aspire for marriage, family and baby making beginning age 18.  The well taught men and women are ready for marriage by age 18.  The infantile culture of never maturing urbanites must not condemn the rest of the Filipino people with their marriage failures.

You want a better model?  I say the muslims have a better model. They can get married at younger ages and achieve more success.

I’ve mentioned long before that my children will opt out of this rotten man corrupted culture of marriage failures.  Upping the marriage age to 24 just proves my point that the mis-education of the Population controllers has infiltrated members of the Catholic Church.

The original universal intent of marriage is for the survival of the civilization, the proliferation of people, to enhance the reproduction of people.

Since 18 – 24 is the prime reproductive ages of people, and this is fixed by NATURE, you can’t change that, no preacher can change that.   But you can WORK WITH NATURE.  You can go along with NATURE and see that the reproductive activities of people ages 18-24 are put to good use… for actual reproduction… REAL SEX.  Not fake contraceptive sex.  Not “true love waits” aka “suppress sexual activity until the ages where you are no longer interested in sex.”

The result of a BAN ON MARRIAGE in the 18-24 age range is a more MARKED increase in “SINFUL” / non-marriage sex -  leading to EVEN LESS CHILDREN, EVEN LESS FAMILY FORMATION, EVEN MORE CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE.

This 24 year old minimum marrying age idea belongs in the trash can.

See the news report from http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/man/2008/01/25/news/bishop.backs.revision.of.law.on.marriage.html

Friday, January 25, 2008
Bishop backs revision of law on marriage

A SENIOR official of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) is pushing to amend the law on the minimum legal age for marriage from 18 to 24.

During a dialogue last Wednesday with members of the House of Representatives and the Senate in Pasay City, former CBCP president and Lingayen Archbishop Oscar Cruz, head of the National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal, asked for the revision of the law on marriage.

Sun.Star Network Online’s coverage of the Sinulog 2008 Festival

Cruz said the present age requirement for marrying need to be refined, noting that an 18-year-old man and woman, are still incapable of living alone and has yet to establish his/her independence.

“They should be mentally and financially capable and prepared since marriage involves raising a family,” he said.

The bishop added that marriage is not like a girl and boy relationship, it involves many responsibilities that require physical, emotional and spiritual preparedness.

He said amending the marrying age requirement might be the solution to avert troubles in marriage.

However, Cruz said they are against divorce, since it is against the rulings of the church.

On the other hand, Senate President Manuel “Manny” Villar Jr. and House Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr., the discussion’s heads of the panel of legislators, said they will study Cruz’s recommendation. (FP/Sunnex)