<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pronatalists of the world unite! &#187; Contraception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pronatal.org/category/contraception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pronatal.org</link>
	<description>Fight for our right to normal sexuality and fertility. Pronatal, Pro-Life, Pro-Family.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:07:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chavit Singson &#8211; Che Tiongson &#8211; Richard Catral and the Primal fight of Selfish Genes</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/09/06/chavit-singson-che-tiongson-richard-catral-and-the-primal-fight-of-selfish-genes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/09/06/chavit-singson-che-tiongson-richard-catral-and-the-primal-fight-of-selfish-genes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fertility Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paternity DNA Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest celebrity scandal on the news these days is Philippine Security Adviser Chavit Singson 68 (many wives, many children) with one of his common law wives Che Tiongson 37 (bore 5 alleged children with Chavit) and her new boyfriend &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2009/09/06/chavit-singson-che-tiongson-richard-catral-and-the-primal-fight-of-selfish-genes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest celebrity scandal on the news these days is Philippine Security Adviser Chavit Singson 68 (many wives, many children) with one of his common law wives Che Tiongson 37 (bore 5 alleged children with Chavit) and her new boyfriend Richard Catral 38 (married with 2 kids).  Since this is a ProNatal website we dissect and analyze according to primal human reproductive instincts.<span id="more-287"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-291" title="rachel-and-her-men-montage" src="http://www.pronatal.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/rachel-and-her-men-montage.jpg" alt="rachel-and-her-men-montage" width="480" height="190" /></p>
<p>Chavit is a well known rich and powerful patriarch, a pronatal patriarch with alleged several wives and many children.  He is rumored to have a new wife every few years and move on and on.  Chavit loves children and wants children.  Chavit wants custody of his 5 children with Che, patriarchs are interested more in children than just sex.  Sex is merely a tool to make children.  Chavit was noted in saying in a private family party to his descendants to make and make babies&#8230; because we have lots of money.  Isn&#8217;t that so nice?</p>
<p>If you are any intelligent male with any sanity left in you, you do not go out of your way provoking Chavit&#8217;s anger by attempting to inseminate any female in his alleged harem.  As in primal human nature, the big bull will protect his genetic interests and will do whatever it takes to ward off foolish males from trying to reproduce with any of his alleged harem.  Any patriarch invests and spends on his harem for his exclusive insemination to propagate his own genes.</p>
<p>Chavit stood up to the President of the Philippines Erap Estrada (on a different issue) and won that battle&#8230; do you think any lesser man like this foolish Richard Catral can stand a chance?</p>
<p>My analysis of Richard Catral is that he saw a beautiful woman and with his own good looks saw an opportunity to reproduce by attempting to inseminate Che.  This is it, a sperm wars classic.  Previous to the alleged beating of Che, she was inseminated by Chavit just the same.  The sperm battle is on.  Who will win out?  Only a DNA test in the future will reveal the sperm wars winner.</p>
<p>The wild card is, is Che on birth control?  Birth control technologies muddle the whole primal instincts scenario.</p>
<p>What is happening is a very easy, very classic case of genetic interests.  Maybe Che merely needed a rest from birthing.  When she got her rest from birthing&#8230; she is ready to be impregnated again, thus accepting new inseminators.</p>
<p>All those muddling the issue of primal human genetic interests is due to civilization, technology, political ideologies and twisted inhuman laws.</p>
<p>I would like to see a surprise pause to all this much publicized scandal with the announcement of a pregnancy.  Then I want a Maury Show type genetic dna paternity test drama to show WHO IS THE FATHER.</p>
<p>The Human Primal instinct for genetic propagation is alive and well.  Everyone wants to reproduce.  Lots of inseminating happening&#8230; Look at this issue and just laugh at the rest of the side issues like human twisted written laws.</p>
<p>I think Richard Catral is the true victim here.  My guess is Che did not tell him she belonged to the harem of Chavit Singson.  Any guy in his right mind would stay away from Chavit&#8217;s women.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4060503462070894";
/* Pronatal 336x280, created 7/21/09 */
google_ad_slot = "2086213320";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/09/06/chavit-singson-che-tiongson-richard-catral-and-the-primal-fight-of-selfish-genes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The top requirement in a woman is the health and willingness to bear and raise children</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/10/the-top-requirement-in-a-woman-is-the-health-and-willingness-to-bear-and-raise-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/10/the-top-requirement-in-a-woman-is-the-health-and-willingness-to-bear-and-raise-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depopulation Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The depopulation agenda has been successful in brainwashing most people of the world today. Not only are people poor materially, but also physically and mentally. Women today are reluctant to give birth and raise children themselves for many reasons. When &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/10/the-top-requirement-in-a-woman-is-the-health-and-willingness-to-bear-and-raise-children/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The depopulation agenda has been successful in brainwashing most people of the world today.  Not only are people poor materially, but also physically and mentally.  Women today are reluctant to give birth and raise children themselves for many reasons.<span id="more-276"></span></p>
<p>When selecting a woman for a mate, companion, wife, it is very important to not lose track of our primary objective in life, which is to make more life.  Sure a woman of your liking may seem very pretty, but beauty is useless and pointless if she is unwilling to bear your children.</p>
<p>The problem is males still run on pure instinct.  Young males look for the prettiest thing.  In the old days, the prettiest thing also engaged in reproductive sex which led to children and the raising of children.  Nowadays many women are taught to engage in contraceptive sex with abortion as a backup.  Women are taught that raising one&#8217;s own children is pathetic so they strive to work at anything other than raising their own children.  Leave children to be raised by professional strangers paid to raise children.</p>
<p>Then there is the problem of rampant un-health.  As people have degenerated through the generations due to bad habits, bad food, knowing all the bad health practices as dictated by commercial television, radio and magazines.  Their capabilities to bear children are extremely diminished.  Many are infertile, many cannot bring a pregnancy to term.</p>
<p>Choosing a woman these days is a very delicate thing.  You must make clear your objectives.  You have the health, the wealth and the will to make children and your choice of women must meet your wishes.  Birds of the same feather flock together.  Seek the right woman and you will find her.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4060503462070894";
/* Pronatal 336x280, created 7/21/09 */
google_ad_slot = "2086213320";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/10/the-top-requirement-in-a-woman-is-the-health-and-willingness-to-bear-and-raise-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you vehemently disagree with women&#8217;s Marriage beginning 14 years old, you must not be a Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/07/28/if-you-vehemently-disagree-with-womens-marriage-beginning-14-years-old-you-must-not-be-a-christian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/07/28/if-you-vehemently-disagree-with-womens-marriage-beginning-14-years-old-you-must-not-be-a-christian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is funny to see how many people today can be such narrow minded regarding the issue of the once and for many centuries a legal age to get married beginning 14 years of age. Where are the vive le &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2009/07/28/if-you-vehemently-disagree-with-womens-marriage-beginning-14-years-old-you-must-not-be-a-christian/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is funny to see how many people today can be such narrow minded regarding the issue of the once and for many centuries a legal age to get married beginning 14 years of age.  Where are the vive le difference attitudes?  Different strokes for different folks?  Do we all have to tow your communist line?<span id="more-271"></span></p>
<p>Hey, my natural calling to desire children was around 20 years old.  I called for marriage by the time I was 25 but my then 22 year old wife to be was not &#8220;ready&#8221; at her age then.  My sister got married at 23.  My mother got married at 22.  My grandmother got married at 19.</p>
<p>My friend&#8217;s mother got married at 14.  It was legal during their time.  And the family&#8217;s approved of it.  A lot of visayans in the province of Samar have the tradition of marrying off their children at 14 and 15.  Even today, in Islamic Philippine society, the minimum marrying age for islamic women is 16 years old.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to tweak the minds of all you narrow minded nay sayers.  Yes you, who would rather have teenagers exhaust their expected biological sexuality with unsatisfying condoms and poison birth control pills.  Different strokes for different folks.  DIVERSITY ROCKS&#8230;. not your uniformitarian COMMUNISM.</p>
<p>Do you call yourself a Christian?  At what age did you think The Virgin Mary bore Jesus?  She was 14 and to be married to Joseph.  Oh, so now you call your Christian God a pedophile?</p>
<p>Raising the minimum marrying age in the Philippines from 14 to 18 was a BIG MISTAKE.  It was pressure from the international community backed my hundreds of millions of dollars in depopulation funding by the imperialist governments.  Now I hear the same funders and their idiot minions pushing to increase the minimum marrying age to 24.  Tsk tsk tsk&#8230;  People do not EVOLVE that fast.</p>
<p>This 15 year old has her reproductive instincts kicking in.  But unfortunately for her, her communist society will not approve.  This is why she resorts to going &#8220;wild.&#8221;  She will do what she needs to do to produce her baby.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6uneIieUrgI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6uneIieUrgI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>In more conservative, wiser times, the people understood that there are women at this age that come to heat.  This is why they accommodated these people into the institution of marriage.  It&#8217;s just their time.  It was time for her to have her baby, so LET HER.  Marry her off to a nice man who also believed in marriage and also believed in babies.</p>
<p>Maybe the virgin Mary would have turned into something like this &#8220;wild&#8221; teen if she wasn&#8217;t married off during HER TIME.</p>
<p>I would like to repeat again my call to all you narrow minded communists.  Different strokes for different folks.  Let us not oppress the people who&#8217;s reproductive calling comes at 14 or 15 years of age.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4060503462070894";
/* Pronatal 336x280, created 7/21/09 */
google_ad_slot = "2086213320";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/07/28/if-you-vehemently-disagree-with-womens-marriage-beginning-14-years-old-you-must-not-be-a-christian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to make more babies by optimizing sexual activity</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/11/11/how-to-make-more-babies-by-optimizing-sexual-activity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/11/11/how-to-make-more-babies-by-optimizing-sexual-activity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fertility Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Pro-Life Philippines forum, a curious American lady posted criticisms regarding my piece: Contraception harms people, society and civilization. Her criticism was on the following section of my article: The natural scheme of things is that males and females &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2008/11/11/how-to-make-more-babies-by-optimizing-sexual-activity/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Pro-Life Philippines forum, a curious American lady posted criticisms regarding my piece: <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/contraception-harms-people-society-and-civilization/" target="_blank">Contraception harms people, society and civilization.</a> Her criticism was on the following section of my article:</p>
<blockquote><p>The natural scheme of things is that males and females are attracted to one another. They have sexual intercourse, females become pregnant. Children are born. Children are raised to become adults life goes on.</p>
<p>In the natural scheme of things, healthy men are sexually active when called upon for action. Women have a cycle where they are interested in sex when the time is “right”. That right time is when she is healthy and willing to bear children. A pregnant female is not interested in any more sex, nor should she be having sex, she is already pregnant. Do you understand?</p>
<p>Once a female has given birth, she needs to breast feed her little one for some 2 years and stick close to her baby. At this time there is no desire for children. And if there is no desire for children, no sex is desired.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-196"></span><br />
She disagreed with this piece with her arguments below:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is true that the natural cycle of reproduction works in such a way that most people are heterosexual and thus attracted to people of the opposite gender. In the absence of contraception, sexual intercourse is likely to result in pregnancy.</p>
<p>Everything after that is a complete misunderstanding of female sexuality. Are women more likely to desire sex during their most fertile times? Perhaps, maybe slightly. It varies depending on the woman. It is not as if women go into heat like dogs. Most women don&#8217;t even know when they ovulate. Women have and enjoy sex throughout their cycle, not just when they are fertile.</p>
<p>Pregnant and nursing women still desire sex. In fact, some pregnant women desire sex even more because of the higher blood flow to the genital area and the influx of hormones. Later in pregnancy, sex can become awkward because of the woman&#8217;s large uterus, but it can and is still done. Nursing women have sex as well. If they have less it is because they don&#8217;t feel their body is as sexy or because caring for their child has made them sleep deprived.</p>
<p>One other thing: You speak as if sex is purely for procreation &#8211; as if a pregnant woman SHOULD not want sex because the &#8220;mission&#8221; has already been accomplished. That is a ridiculous and offensive. You say: &#8220;A pregnant female is not interested in any more sex, nor should she be having sex, she is already pregnant.&#8221; That is patently wrong.</p></blockquote>
<p>So I had to go and teach Pronatal 101 basics: How to make more babies by optimizing sexual activity</p>
<blockquote><p>This section shows the recommendations of a cure for all diseases altruistic healer.</p>
<p>Sexual activities are pleasurable and desirable because nature made it so for human life to procreate.</p>
<p>From an altruistic healer and pronatalist perspective, I want people to have SAFE pregnancies, HEALTHY pregnancies, SUCCESSFUL pregnancies.  You will have to observe that today in the 21st century, FERTILITY RATES are at ALL TIME LOWS, which will include many MISCARRIAGES and skyrocketing INFERTILITY RATES due to BOTH:</p>
<p>CONTRACEPTIVE MENTALITY</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>UNHEALTHY CONSTITUTIONS of humans in general</p>
<p>The basics of human health are twisted and hidden by the current western medical pharmaceutical monopoly of people&#8217;s minds.</p>
<p>Due to contraceptive mentality, abuse of sexual advertising, and a twisted medical obgyn professions, too much sexual activity is expended by a majority of young people leading to enervation (too much stimulation).  The side effect is that young people, who today are toxic because of the wrong food pyramid and marketed junk lifestyle food and personal care products are ejecting lots of toxic waste and getting sickly and infertile.</p>
<p>The sexual side effect is that the reproductive organs&#8230; turned to pleasure organs&#8230; like some drug addiction&#8230; becomes an OUTLET OF TOXIC WASTE.  So much so that a very large, unquantified amount of MISCARRIAGES today is caused by this TOXICITY.</p>
<p>When a woman is already pregnant, OBGYNs recommend more sexual activity until almost birth&#8230; it fits their $$$ greedy medical model, as more problems can and will come out and need more $$$ servicing.  From the point of view of couples who have long wanted children, this extra sexual activity is a BIG RISK for miscarriages given the TOXICITY and waste disposal through the reproductive organs of TOXIC PEOPLE.</p>
<p>I have been teaching this FACT at <a href="http://www.fertilityhelp.net/" target="_blank">http://www.fertilityhelp.net</a> and at the nurturing guide in <a href="http://www.curemanual.com/" target="_blank">http://www.curemanual.com</a></p>
<p>This is what I say as OPTIMAL use of sexual reproductive capabilities of people.  This recommendation MAXIMIZES the health of couples.  MAXIMIZES the FERTILITY.  MAXIMIZES the health of babies, MAXIMIZES the fertility rates.</p>
<p>It is all about BENEFIT, maximum fertility, maximum chances of success for healthy mothers and healthy babies, maximizing PRONATALITY.</p>
<p>A pause of sexual activity during pregnancy and recovery  regenerates the sexual tension / potential between couples and the FRUIT of such potential energy maximizes fertility for THE NEXT reproductive attempt.  This is how you make many children.  This is how couples of olden times were able to produce 7 children or more per woman.  This is Prolife, Pronatal, education hands on.</p>
<p>Sex is like eating.  Sex at the right time and quantity is great, it is wonderful.  In excess, and in the wrong times and the wrong kind of sex, sex can be detrimental, just like eating.</p>
<p>Use this knowledge wisely.</p></blockquote>
<p>This discussion can be found at the <a href="http://forums.prolife.org.ph/yabbse/index.php?topic=1878.msg3949#msg3949" target="_blank">Pro-Life Philippines forum.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/11/11/how-to-make-more-babies-by-optimizing-sexual-activity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men degraded, enslaved by agreeing to contraception</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/men-degraded-enslaved-by-agreeing-to-contraception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/men-degraded-enslaved-by-agreeing-to-contraception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/men-degraded-enslaved-by-agreeing-to-contraception/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man is a wonderful thing. All that power, all that energy, all that intelligence. A man&#8217;s sexual instincts allows him to reproduce for the survival of his bloodline. Paired with an equally wonderful woman, wonderful offspring are produced. But &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/men-degraded-enslaved-by-agreeing-to-contraception/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A man is a wonderful thing.  All that power, all that energy, all that intelligence.  A man&#8217;s sexual instincts allows him to reproduce for the survival of his bloodline.  Paired with an equally wonderful woman, wonderful offspring are produced.</p>
<p>But paired to a contraceptive woman and agreeing to her demands of contraception, he his demoted to a lowly snake slithering on the ground begging for sex.  Phoooey.  A man begging for sex is pathetic.  Agreeing to contraceptive sex is pathetic.  The contraceptive woman today is the most common type of woman.  This is why society is dysfunctional.  And this is no accident.  Contraception is ingrained in today&#8217;s children, in the feminist manifestos, in marriage seminars.  Some men get into marriage thinking it is open access to beautiful sex, instead submit to chains of contraception that enable a facade called monogamy.</p>
<p>There are many good men out there.  Family oriented, family serving men.  Most confronted with demands of contraception from women who demand monogamy. A few months later the contraceptive sexual activity gets old, stale and downright not worth it.  It is not so different from aversion to sexual activity induced by infertility problems.<br />
A man agreeing to contraception is not a man.  He is a slave to his woman.  He is a slave to his sexual desires.  The 21st century are feminist times.  Men have been castrated by contraception.  Contraception is the core of the feminist religion.</p>
<p>Men can break the feminist stranglehold by swearing off all forms of contraception with his women.  If she wants contraception, then let her be.  Never beg.  Never be enslaved.  There are better women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/men-degraded-enslaved-by-agreeing-to-contraception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contraception harms people, society and civilization</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/contraception-harms-people-society-and-civilization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/contraception-harms-people-society-and-civilization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/contraception-harms-people-society-and-civilization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The natural scheme of things is that males and females are attracted to one another. They have sexual intercourse, females become pregnant. Children are born. Children are raised to become adults life goes on. In the natural scheme of things, &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/contraception-harms-people-society-and-civilization/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The natural scheme of things is that males and females are attracted to one another.  They have sexual intercourse, females become pregnant.  Children are born.  Children are raised to become adults life goes on.</p>
<p>In the natural scheme of things, healthy men are sexually active when called upon for action.  Women have a cycle where they are interested in sex when the time is &#8220;right&#8221;.  That right time is when she is healthy and willing to bear children.  A pregnant female is not interested in any more sex, nor should she be having sex, she is already pregnant.  Do you understand?</p>
<p>Once a female has given birth, she needs to breast feed her little one for some 2 years and stick close to her baby.  At this time there is no desire for children.  And if there is no desire for children, no sex is desired.</p>
<p>Now the civilization and other means of organization have come up with marriage.  A man for every child to ensure that children are better taken cared of.  A man and his whole family plus the woman and her family is a pretty good idea.  Since a woman may only be interested in sex every 2 to 3 years it makes no sense for a man to with hold his sexuality in those 2 to 3 years where a woman is not sexually available, nor should it make sense to rush a woman and have additional children when she is not healthy nor ready yet.  So it was and still is natural for men to have multiple wives.  Everyone was happy with this arrangement.  The man&#8217;s family had more offspring through their men.  And the women could pick the best men in their village to fertilize them.  Polygamy was the norm and everyone was happy.</p>
<p>Then an imperialist civilization arose and through their primitive monetary system and contraceptive technology had the dumb idea to impose government business partnerships called marriage and made it exclusive and unnatural.  They called this invention monogamy.  An artificial construct founded on contraceptive herbs and technology.  They made it law that men and women can marry only one at a time.  If they wanted a new partner, they needed to divorce their old partner.  In the old days, you just added a new wife and everyone was happy.  Common divorces made people unhappy in the empire and eventually the concept of marriage became moot and no one wanted to have anything with that government partnership called marriage.</p>
<p>Fast forward 2000 years later today in my country.  Monogamy is made possible through contraceptive technology.  Women become sexual toys, sexual receptacles, available to give and receive sexual pleasure any time with minimum possibilities of pregnancy.  In government marriage, men are given the unnatural burden to have sex with only one woman because with contraceptive technology, that woman, his wife can supposedly fill all his sexual entertainment wants.</p>
<p>But this is unnatural.  Millions of years of evolution cannot be enforced by man made laws policing sexual behavior.  What happens today is that contraceptive technology has debased sexuality into a religion of entertainment, of pleasure, instead of sex being a means for reproduction.  This sexual repression has led to enormous industries serving the contraceptive side effects.  Prostitution is the all encompassing side effect.  Millions of women are now prostitutes for money, for food, for love, for free.  Millions of men have been stunted of their maturities by submitting to contraceptive sex.</p>
<p>Millions of women feel they are goddesses, they control a man through his contraceptive penis.  What a shame.  What a low down shame people have gone today.  Men submitting to women and thanking them for sex?  Give me a break.<br />
Top grade males are always in high demand.  Top grade males do not submit to contraceptive slavery.  A woman who partners with top grade males want their sperm, they demand it, top material to make their babies with.</p>
<p>And punishing males for their non-compliance to monogamy?  What an an unnatural man made abomination of laws we are  living in.  Most wives cannot keep their end of the bargain.  Most of them don&#8217;t enjoy being sexual receptacles and have sex during times they don&#8217;t want to.  Contraceptive technology is imperfect and unhealthy in the first place.  Those health conscious women will merely abstain from sex.  And where does that leave their husbands?  Back to nature.</p>
<p>The idea of a 2nd wife, 3rd wife, 4th wife doesn&#8217;t sound so bad after all now.  What woman wants to give birth year after year after year?</p>
<p>First wife is pregnant, sexual relations stop and continue only when her child is 2 to 4 years old.  A 2nd wife may be a good idea, and when that wife becomes pregnant, a 3rd wife may be a good idea, then a 4th wife, then it is back to wife number 1 then 2, then 3 then 4.  Everyone is happy.</p>
<p>All that is needed today is a change in the monetary system and everyone should be happy.  If each and every child came with a guaranteed living fund, people would choose the natural way.  I&#8217;m dreaming.  The international money masters, the bankers would never want this.  They want the money and the power all to themselves.</p>
<p>Government monogamous only marriage is just one of their tools to control a hapless citizenry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/04/04/contraception-harms-people-society-and-civilization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimum Marrying age of 24 will destroy Philippine Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/02/01/minimum-marrying-age-of-24-will-destroy-philippine-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/02/01/minimum-marrying-age-of-24-will-destroy-philippine-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depopulation Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/2008/02/01/minimum-marrying-age-of-24-will-destroy-philippine-marriage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have total disrespect for the opinion of Bishop Oscar Cruz regarding his opinion that minimum marriage age must be increased from 18 to 24 years old. Hey.  If the Church cannot educate its members about marriage and sexuality, upping &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2008/02/01/minimum-marrying-age-of-24-will-destroy-philippine-marriage/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have total disrespect for the opinion of Bishop Oscar Cruz regarding his opinion that minimum marriage age must be increased from 18 to 24 years old.</p>
<p>Hey.  If the Church cannot educate its members about marriage and sexuality, upping the marriage age to ridiculous ages will not save marriage.  Why stop at 24?  Why not 30?  How about 35?  Geeezzzz&#8230;.</p>
<p>Bishop Cruz is shooting from the hip, or he is blinded or coerced by the Population controllers who would like nothing more than raise the marrying age.</p>
<p>News for you Bishop Oscar Cruz:  18 to 24 is the PRIME reproductive years of human beings.  No man made laws will change that.  18-24 is nature&#8217;s laws.</p>
<p>What you should do:  Pre-teens must be educated and convinced that they aspire for marriage, family and baby making beginning age 18.  The well taught men and women are ready for marriage by age 18.  The infantile culture of never maturing urbanites must not condemn the rest of the Filipino people with their marriage failures.</p>
<p>You want a better model?  I say the muslims have a better model. They can get married at younger ages and achieve more success.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve mentioned long before that my children will opt out of this rotten man corrupted culture of marriage failures.  Upping the marriage age to 24 just proves my point that the mis-education of the Population controllers has infiltrated members of the Catholic Church.</p>
<p>The original universal intent of marriage is for the survival of the civilization, the proliferation of people, to enhance the reproduction of people.</p>
<p>Since 18 &#8211; 24 is the prime reproductive ages of people, and this is fixed by NATURE, you can&#8217;t change that, no preacher can change that.   But you can WORK WITH NATURE.  You can go along with NATURE and see that the reproductive activities of people ages 18-24 are put to good use&#8230; for actual reproduction&#8230; REAL SEX.  Not fake contraceptive sex.  Not &#8220;true love waits&#8221; aka &#8220;suppress sexual activity until the ages where you are no longer interested in sex.&#8221;</p>
<p>The result of a BAN ON MARRIAGE in the 18-24 age range is a more MARKED increase in &#8220;SINFUL&#8221; / non-marriage sex -  leading to EVEN LESS CHILDREN, EVEN LESS FAMILY FORMATION, EVEN MORE CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE.</p>
<p>This 24 year old minimum marrying age idea belongs in the trash can.</p>
<blockquote><p>See the news report from http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/man/2008/01/25/news/bishop.backs.revision.of.law.on.marriage.html</p>
<p>Friday, January 25, 2008<br />
Bishop backs revision of law on marriage</p>
<p>A SENIOR official of the Catholic Bishops&#8217; Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) is pushing to amend the law on the minimum legal age for marriage from 18 to 24.</p>
<p>During a dialogue last Wednesday with members of the House of Representatives and the Senate in Pasay City, former CBCP president and Lingayen Archbishop Oscar Cruz, head of the National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal, asked for the revision of the law on marriage.</p>
<p>Sun.Star Network Online&#8217;s coverage of the Sinulog 2008 Festival</p>
<p>Cruz said the present age requirement for marrying need to be refined, noting that an 18-year-old man and woman, are still incapable of living alone and has yet to establish his/her independence.</p>
<p>&#8220;They should be mentally and financially capable and prepared since marriage involves raising a family,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>The bishop added that marriage is not like a girl and boy relationship, it involves many responsibilities that require physical, emotional and spiritual preparedness.</p>
<p>He said amending the marrying age requirement might be the solution to avert troubles in marriage.</p>
<p>However, Cruz said they are against divorce, since it is against the rulings of the church.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Senate President Manuel &#8220;Manny&#8221; Villar Jr. and House Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr., the discussion&#8217;s heads of the panel of legislators, said they will study Cruz&#8217;s recommendation. (FP/Sunnex)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2008/02/01/minimum-marrying-age-of-24-will-destroy-philippine-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hate Polygamy?  Hate Monogamy?  Condone fornication?</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2007/10/13/hate-polygamy-hate-monogamy-condone-fornication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2007/10/13/hate-polygamy-hate-monogamy-condone-fornication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/2007/10/13/hate-polygamy-hate-monogamy-condone-fornication/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people today are marriage ignorant. They instinctively hate all forms of polygamy. Yet at the same time they can&#8217;t even handle their own monogamy. Nor do they have a clue how their own marriage works. For example this woman &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2007/10/13/hate-polygamy-hate-monogamy-condone-fornication/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people today are marriage ignorant.  They instinctively hate all forms of polygamy.  Yet at the same time they can&#8217;t even handle their own monogamy.  Nor do they have a clue how their own marriage works.</p>
<p>For example this woman who swears against polygamy for her children.  And she won&#8217;t promote monogamous marriage either.  So what is she unconsciously promoting?  Fornication!</p>
<p>These are the useful idiots in 21st century society.  They have no idea what marriage is all about.  In fact they hate marriage, all forms of marriage.  They adore singlehood and the contraceptive fornication that comes with it.</p>
<p>Now don&#8217;t get me started on lifetime sexual abstinence.  No way are my children becoming extinct. Let the others who choose to be extinct be extinct.  Not us.</p>
<p>We are the pronatalists.  We are sexual beings.  We are the reproductive people.  We are the sexy, we are the beautiful, we are the marriageable, we will form families, we will live on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2007/10/13/hate-polygamy-hate-monogamy-condone-fornication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Respect goes to principled non-contraceptive men</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/respect-goes-to-principled-non-contraceptive-men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/respect-goes-to-principled-non-contraceptive-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polygamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/respect-goes-to-principled-non-contraceptive-men/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Men want respect. Some men deserve more respect than others. Respectable men do not beg for sex. This is what you men should remember. Respectable men are non-contraceptive. Contraceptive males are called boys as they cater to the insecurities and &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/respect-goes-to-principled-non-contraceptive-men/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men want respect.  Some men deserve more respect than others.  Respectable men do not beg for sex.  This is what you men should remember.  Respectable men are non-contraceptive.  Contraceptive males are called boys as they cater to the insecurities and whims of females.</p>
<p>Know that contraception is a female ploy.  A man who agrees to contracepting is being played by the female.  Whether the female is his wife, his girlfriend, his fubu, or a plain old prostitute.  Contraception is a way females play russian roulette, it is a manner in which they choose the fathers of their children.  A woman subconsciously chooses the father of her offspring by conveniently &#8220;forgetting&#8221; to put on that condom, by &#8220;forgetting&#8221; to take<br />
her pills, by &#8220;forgetting&#8221; to put on her diaphragm.</p>
<p>A wife may have chosen to marry a man as her legal husband.  But her body language, her reality shows she has in fact NOT chosen him to father her child when she chooses to have fake sex with him by using condoms on him.</p>
<p>Men agreeing to engage in fake sex are poor desperate slobs asking to be whipped by their female masters.  Better to have fake sex than no sex at all they think.  Tsk tsk.</p>
<p>Nonsense!  There are many women out there who will accept your entire manhood, real sex and all.  Will get pregnant?  No problem.  Glad to choose you to father her children, now, today.</p>
<p>Sometimes I think the metaphor of adam and eve was that Eve engaged Adam in contraception.  The forbidden fruit is contraception.  Prostitutes will have fake sex for some money.  Sex with condoms is fake sex.  Sex with birth control pills is fake sex.  Sex for the sake of sex because it is her &#8220;safe&#8221; day is fake sex.</p>
<p>Woe is the man who gets no respect.  The next time your woman tells you to wear a condom&#8230; dress up and leave.  She has no respect for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/respect-goes-to-principled-non-contraceptive-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get a girl hooked on you.  A tip for the playboys.</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/how-to-get-a-girl-hooked-on-you-a-tip-for-the-playboys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/how-to-get-a-girl-hooked-on-you-a-tip-for-the-playboys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babymaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/how-to-get-a-girl-hooked-on-you-a-tip-for-the-playboys/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do the playboys do it?  How can they be the ones in control of a relationship?  Are you a man or a mouse?  Are you under the &#8220;saya&#8221; / skirt of your girlfriend? Here is a big tip make &#8230; <a href="http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/how-to-get-a-girl-hooked-on-you-a-tip-for-the-playboys/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do the playboys do it?  How can they be the ones in control of a relationship?  Are you a man or a mouse?  Are you under the &#8220;saya&#8221; / skirt of your girlfriend?</p>
<p>Here is a big tip make almost any woman stick to you like glue.  That is, if this is what you want.</p>
<p>The secret is to engage in REAL LIVE sexual intercourse.  You read that correctly.  It is penis in the vagina without condoms, without any so called &#8220;protection&#8221;, and inseminating her repeatedly.</p>
<p>You see love is also hormonal and chemical. Your semen has hormones and chemicals that will make a woman love you.  Inseminate them regularly and they will stick to you like glue.</p>
<p>If she gets pregnant?  Shout hooray!  Hallelujah! Contratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pronatal.org/2007/09/28/how-to-get-a-girl-hooked-on-you-a-tip-for-the-playboys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
