<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monogamy only makes sense when having lots of children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/09/monogamy-only-makes-sense-when-having-lots-of-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/09/monogamy-only-makes-sense-when-having-lots-of-children/</link>
	<description>Fight for our right to normal sexuality and fertility. Pronatal, Pro-Life, Pro-Family.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:59:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rattus</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/09/monogamy-only-makes-sense-when-having-lots-of-children/comment-page-1/#comment-8080</link>
		<dc:creator>Rattus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 02:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/?p=274#comment-8080</guid>
		<description>Actually, as soon as humans figured out that men actually had a genetic investment in their offspring, marriage began as polygyny - where the wealthiest men would accumulate multiple wives so that he would produce the most children (sons.)

As noted above, monogamy is about control.  It&#039;s also a fairly recent development, really only the last thousand or so years.  And the concept of the Nuclear family is even newer, only made viable in the wake of Capitalist societies.  This again is about control.  Controlling men, women, and human reproduction.

Have lots of kids if that makes you happy.  Don&#039;t have any if that makes you happy.  Why should anything other people do matter to you if they don&#039;t affect you?  Humans are in no danger of going extinct unless they stupid themselves to death... But having children because you think you&#039;re supposed to (for whatever reason,) when you haven&#039;t got the time, money, or family support to care for them, is not what I would consider a good way to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, as soon as humans figured out that men actually had a genetic investment in their offspring, marriage began as polygyny &#8211; where the wealthiest men would accumulate multiple wives so that he would produce the most children (sons.)</p>
<p>As noted above, monogamy is about control.  It&#8217;s also a fairly recent development, really only the last thousand or so years.  And the concept of the Nuclear family is even newer, only made viable in the wake of Capitalist societies.  This again is about control.  Controlling men, women, and human reproduction.</p>
<p>Have lots of kids if that makes you happy.  Don&#8217;t have any if that makes you happy.  Why should anything other people do matter to you if they don&#8217;t affect you?  Humans are in no danger of going extinct unless they stupid themselves to death&#8230; But having children because you think you&#8217;re supposed to (for whatever reason,) when you haven&#8217;t got the time, money, or family support to care for them, is not what I would consider a good way to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dani</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/09/monogamy-only-makes-sense-when-having-lots-of-children/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/?p=274#comment-690</guid>
		<description>There is nothing &quot;pro-family&quot; in encouraging men to randomly impregnate women just for the sake of baby-making. What kind of &quot;family&quot; is that for the child? If you don&#039;t already know the answer to that question, take a look at your local inner-city ghetto where children are fatherless, unguided and grow up to be junkies, thieves and violent criminals. Marriage is the foundation of any stable family. Having 2 sane, moral, involved parents is necessary for one&#039;s character &amp; development into a sane, balanced adult human being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing &#8220;pro-family&#8221; in encouraging men to randomly impregnate women just for the sake of baby-making. What kind of &#8220;family&#8221; is that for the child? If you don&#8217;t already know the answer to that question, take a look at your local inner-city ghetto where children are fatherless, unguided and grow up to be junkies, thieves and violent criminals. Marriage is the foundation of any stable family. Having 2 sane, moral, involved parents is necessary for one&#8217;s character &amp; development into a sane, balanced adult human being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Clement</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/09/monogamy-only-makes-sense-when-having-lots-of-children/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/?p=274#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Monogamy is not about having children it’s about having control. Marriage is an authoritarian institution designed to control others. It comes from the authoritarian belief that man needs to be domesticated (controlled).

Society is slowly learning to free itself from the belief that slavery is justifiable. To better understand the difference between learning to be free and slavery (being controlled), you need to know the difference between learning and being conditioned. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://thiscrazyworld.tripod.com/AuthorianCivil/&quot; title=&quot;Emulation vs. Conditioning&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Emulation vs. Conditioning&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monogamy is not about having children it’s about having control. Marriage is an authoritarian institution designed to control others. It comes from the authoritarian belief that man needs to be domesticated (controlled).</p>
<p>Society is slowly learning to free itself from the belief that slavery is justifiable. To better understand the difference between learning to be free and slavery (being controlled), you need to know the difference between learning and being conditioned. See <a href="http://thiscrazyworld.tripod.com/AuthorianCivil/" title="Emulation vs. Conditioning" rel="nofollow">Emulation vs. Conditioning</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monogamy only makes sense when having lots of children &#124; Be Happiness</title>
		<link>http://www.pronatal.org/2009/08/09/monogamy-only-makes-sense-when-having-lots-of-children/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Monogamy only makes sense when having lots of children &#124; Be Happiness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pronatal.org/?p=274#comment-548</guid>
		<description>[...] posted here: Monogamy only makes sense when having lots of children   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted here: Monogamy only makes sense when having lots of children   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

