08.29.07
Vienna Study: Age difference is key to having most kids
This is a nice piece of information for all your pronatal parents. Good too for all pronatal singles. Probably explains why polygamous societies make more children. Why islamic Filipinos make more children than their Christian counterparts.
The study says the sweet spot age difference is a man 6 years older than the woman. Say my daughter is 18 and she finds a 24 year old man to marry. Sounds great to me. I call it the “gigil” factor. I don’t know the english word for “gigil”, it is a feeling when you see someone so cute and so young like a toddler you want to hug, kiss and smother with love and of course squish with your hands.
I personally don’t know about the 6 years thing. I think an 18 or 19 year old woman is absolutely the prime baby making age and would make any man fertile. Match this with a pronatal man at the prime of his age at say 24 and you’ve got grandchildren popping out every so often.
Of course the contraceptively brainwashed will waste their health and youthful sexuality on condoms. Then they’ll try for baby the very first time when they are OLD in their 30s when the sex gets old and boring. Booooo.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070829/sc_nm/children_age_dc
Age difference is key to having most kids: study
By Michael Kahn 2 hours, 58 minutes agoLONDON (Reuters) - To have the most children, men should find a partner six years younger and women a mate four years older, Austrian researchers said on Wednesday.
The researchers tried to use evolution to explain why men often prefer younger women and what typically drives women’s desire for older men, said their leader, Vienna University anthropologist Martin Fieder.
While it is no surprise to hear that men pick younger women to bolster their reproductive fitness and that women choose older partners for security, the study is the first to quantify the age difference that results in the most children, he said.
“Nobody has shown before this has consequences for the number of offspring,” Fieder said in a telephone interview. “We have shown for the first time this is the case.”
The researchers wanted to find the most beneficial ages for both men and women to have the most offspring, so looked at the data with that in mind and came out with different numbers for each.
Writing in the Royal Society’s Biology Letters on Wednesday, the researchers said they collected information from Swedish national registries to track the number of births and age of parents going back 55 years.
The researchers looked at men and women who did not change their partners between the birth of their first and last child and found the age differences among couples that produced the most offspring.
For both men and women, having a partner of the optimal age meant having an average of 2.2 children compared with 2.1 children when they picked partners of the same age — a significant number in evolutionary terms that accumulates over time, Fieder said.
The findings are the result of a statistical analysis and do not mean that every man can find a woman six years younger and that every women would find a man four years older.
“It was a very systemic pattern,” Fieder said. “We don’t think it is random.”
The study of couples during their typical child-bearing years also showed that both men and women who changed partners usually chose a person younger than the one they had before for their second one, Fieder said.
The finding regarding men was expected but that women also traded in for a younger partner was surprising, said Fieder. He suggested that because women are older when finding a second partner, they look for a younger, more fertile man.
“This holds true both for men and women: men shift to a much younger partner; women shift to a partner less old than the first,” the researchers wrote.
